Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, and Judgement | seisiyns.gq

 

reasoning in critical thinking

Background. This chapter examines multiple thinking strategies that are needed for high-quality clinical practice. Clinical reasoning and judgment are examined in relation to other modes of thinking used by clinical nurses in providing quality health care to patients that avoids adverse events and patient seisiyns.gq by: It’s no surprise that critical thinking abilities are some of the most sought-after skills in almost every industry and workplace. You can demonstrate critical thinking by using keywords related to this skill in your resume and cover letter, and during your interview. Critical thinkers understand that even the wisest people may be wrong at times. Confident in Reasoning: Critical thinkers have faith in the power of logic and sound reasoning. Critical thinkers understand that it is in everyone’s best interest to encourage and develop sound logic.


Critical Thinking and Reasoning: Logic and the Role of Arguments | Public Speaking


NCBI Bookshelf. Hughes RG, editor. Patricia Benner ; Ronda G. Hughes ; Molly Sutphen. Authors Patricia Benner ; 1 Ronda G. Hughes ; 2 Molly Sutphen. This chapter examines multiple thinking strategies that are needed for high-quality clinical practice. Clinical reasoning and judgment are examined in relation to other modes of thinking used by clinical nurses in providing quality health care to patients that avoids adverse events and patient harm.

The expert performance of nurses is dependent upon continual learning and evaluation of performance. Nursing education has emphasized critical thinking as an essential nursing skill for more than 50 years. There are several key definitions for critical thinking to consider. The American Philosophical Association APA defined critical thinking as purposeful, self-regulatory judgment that uses cognitive tools such as interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations on which judgment is based.

It presupposes assent reasoning in critical thinking rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use, reasoning in critical thinking. It entails effective communication and problem solving abilities and a commitment to overcome our native egocentrism and sociocentrism, reasoning in critical thinking. Every clinician must develop rigorous habits of critical thinking, but they cannot escape completely the situatedness and structures of the clinical traditions and practices in which they must make decisions and act quickly in specific clinical situations.

Reasoning in critical thinking are three key definitions for nursing, which differ slightly. Scheffer and Rubenfeld 5 expanded on the APA definition for nurses through a consensus process, resulting in reasoning in critical thinking following definition:.

Critical thinking in nursing is an essential component of professional accountability and quality nursing care. Critical thinkers in nursing exhibit these habits of the mind: confidence, contextual perspective, creativity, flexibility, inquisitiveness, intellectual integrity, intuition, openmindedness, reasoning in critical thinking, perseverance, and reflection.

This is demonstrated in nursing by clinical judgment, which includes ethical, diagnostic, and therapeutic dimensions and research 7 p. Critical thinking underlies independent and interdependent decision making. Critical thinking includes questioning, analysis, synthesis, interpretation, inference, inductive and deductive reasoning, reasoning in critical thinking, intuition, application, and creativity 8 p.

Taken together, these definitions of critical thinking set forth the scope and key elements of thought processes involved in providing clinical care. Exactly how critical thinking is defined will influence how it is taught and to what standard of care nurses will be held accountable. Professional and regulatory bodies in nursing education have required that critical thinking be central to all nursing curricula, but they have not adequately distinguished critical reflection from ethical, clinical, or even creative thinking for decisionmaking or actions required by the clinician.

Other essential modes of thought such as clinical reasoning, evaluation of evidence, creative thinking, or the application of well-established standards of practice—all distinct from critical reflection—have been subsumed under the rubric of critical thinking, reasoning in critical thinking. In the nursing education literature, clinical reasoning and judgment are often conflated with critical thinking, reasoning in critical thinking.

The accrediting bodies and nursing scholars have included decisionmaking and action-oriented, practical, reasoning in critical thinking, ethical, and clinical reasoning in the rubric of reasoning in critical thinking reflection and thinking. One might say that this harmless semantic confusion is corrected by actual practices, except that students need to understand the distinctions between critical reflection and clinical reasoning, and they need to learn to discern when each is better suited, just as students need to also engage in applying standards, evidence-based practices, and creative thinking.

The growing body of research, patient acuity, and complexity of care demand higher-order thinking skills. Critical thinking involves the application of knowledge and experience to identify patient problems and to direct clinical judgments and actions that result in positive patient outcomes.

These skills can be cultivated by educators who display the virtues of critical thinking, including independence of thought, intellectual curiosity, courage, humility, empathy, integrity, perseverance, and fair-mindedness. The process of critical thinking is stimulated by integrating the reasoning in critical thinking knowledge, experiences, and clinical reasoning that support professional practice.

The emerging paradigm for clinical thinking and cognition is that it is social and dialogical rather than monological and individual. Early warnings of problematic situations are made possible by clinicians comparing their observations to that of other providers.

Clinicians form practice communities that create styles of practice, including ways of doing things, communication styles and mechanisms, and shared expectations about performance and expertise of team members, reasoning in critical thinking.

By holding up critical thinking as a large umbrella for different modes of reasoning in critical thinking, students can easily misconstrue the logic and purposes of different modes of thinking. Clinicians and scientists alike need multiple thinking strategies, such as critical thinking, clinical judgment, diagnostic reasoning, deliberative rationality, scientific reasoning, dialogue, argument, creative thinking, and so on.

Critical reflection requires that the thinker examine the underlying assumptions and radically question or doubt the validity of arguments, assertions, and even facts of the case. Critical reflective reasoning in critical thinking are essential for clinicians; however, these skills are not sufficient for the clinician who must decide how to act in particular situations and avoid patient injury. Available research is based upon multiple, taken-for-granted starting points about the general nature of the circulatory system.

As such, critical reflection may not provide what is needed for a clinician to act in a situation. This idea can be considered reasonable since critical reflective thinking is not sufficient for good clinical reasoning and judgment. The powers of noticing or perceptual grasp depend upon noticing what is salient and the capacity to respond to the situation. Critical reflection is a crucial professional skill, but it is not the only reasoning skill or logic clinicians require.

The ability to think critically uses reflection, induction, deduction, analysis, challenging assumptions, and evaluation of data and information to guide decisionmaking. Critical thinking is inherent in making sound clinical reasoning, reasoning in critical thinking.

An essential point of tension and confusion exists in practice traditions such as nursing and medicine when clinical reasoning and critical reflection become entangled, because the clinician must have some established bases that are not questioned when engaging in clinical decisions and actions, such as standing orders. The clinician must act in the particular situation and time with the best clinical and scientific knowledge available.

The clinician cannot afford to indulge in either ritualistic unexamined knowledge or diagnostic or therapeutic nihilism caused by radical doubt, as in critical reflection, because they must find an intelligent and effective way to think and act in particular clinical situations. Critical reflection skills are essential to assist practitioners to rethink outmoded or even wrong-headed approaches to health care, health promotion, and prevention of illness and complications, especially when new evidence is available.

Breakdowns in practice, high failure rates in particular therapies, new diseases, new scientific discoveries, and societal changes call for critical reflection about past assumptions and no-longer-tenable beliefs. Clinical reasoning stands out as a situated, practice-based form of reasoning that requires a background of scientific and technological research-based knowledge about general cases, more so than any particular instance.

It also requires practical ability to discern the relevance of the evidence behind general scientific and technical knowledge and how it applies to a particular patient, reasoning in critical thinking.

Situated in a practice setting, clinical reasoning occurs within social relationships or situations involving patient, family, community, and a team of health care providers. The expert clinician situates themselves within a nexus of relationships, with concerns that are bounded by the situation. Expert clinical reasoning is socially engaged with the relationships and concerns of those who are affected by the caregiving situation, and when certain circumstances are present, the adverse event.

Expert clinicians also seek an optimal perceptual grasp, one based on understanding and as undistorted as possible, based on an attuned emotional engagement and expert clinical knowledge. Clergy educators 21 and nursing and medical educators have begun to recognize the wisdom of broadening their narrow vision of rationality beyond simple rational calculation exemplified by cost-benefit analysis to reconsider the need for character development—including emotional engagement, reasoning in critical thinking, perception, habits of thought, and skill acquisition—as essential to the development of expert clinical reasoning, judgment, and action.

However, the practice and practitioners will not be self-improving and vital if they cannot engage in critical reflection on what is not of value, what is outmoded, and what does not work. As evidence evolves and expands, so too must clinical thought. Clinical judgment requires clinical reasoning across time about the particular, and because of the relevance of this immediate historical unfolding, clinical reasoning can be very different from the scientific reasoning used to formulate, conduct, and assess clinical experiments.

While scientific reasoning is also socially embedded in a nexus of social relationships and concerns, the goal of detached, critical objectivity used to conduct scientific experiments minimizes the interactive influence of the research on the experiment once it has begun.

The scientist is always situated in past and immediate scientific history, preferring to evaluate static and predetermined points in time e. Distinctions between the mere scientific making of things and practice was first explored by Aristotle as distinctions between techne and phronesis. For example, was the refusal based upon catastrophic thinking, unrealistic fears, misunderstanding, or even clinical depression?

Techne, as defined by Aristotle, encompasses the notion of formation of character and habitus 28 as embodied beings. While some aspects of medical and nursing practice fall into the category of techne, much of nursing and medical practice falls outside means-ends rationality and must be governed by concern for doing good or what is best for the patient in particular circumstances, where being in a relationship and discerning particular human concerns at stake guide action.

Such a particular reasoning in critical thinking situation is necessarily particular, even though many commonalities and similarities with other disease syndromes can be recognized through signs and symptoms and laboratory tests. Phronesis is also dependent on ongoing experiential learning of the practitioner, where knowledge is refined, corrected, reasoning in critical thinking, or refuted, reasoning in critical thinking. The Western tradition, with the notable exception of Aristotle, valued knowledge that could be made universal and devalued practical know-how and experiential learning.

Descartes codified this preference for formal logic and rational calculation. Aristotle recognized that when knowledge is underdetermined, changeable, and particular, it cannot be turned into the universal or standardized.

It must be perceived, discerned, and judged, reasoning in critical thinking, all of which require experiential learning, reasoning in critical thinking. In nursing and medicine, reasoning in critical thinking, perceptual acuity in physical assessment and clinical judgment i. Dewey 32 sought to rescue knowledge gained by practical activity in the world. He identified three flaws in the understanding of experience in Greek philosophy: 1 empirical knowing is the opposite of experience with science; 2 practice is reduced to techne or the application of rational thought or technique; and 3 action and skilled know-how are considered temporary and capricious as compared to reason, which the Greeks considered as ultimate reality.

In practice, nursing and medicine require both techne and phronesis. Rational calculations available to techne—population trends and statistics, algorithms—are created as decision support structures and can improve accuracy when used as a stance of inquiry in making clinical judgments about particular patients.

Aggregated evidence from clinical trials and ongoing working knowledge of pathophysiology, biochemistry, and genomics are essential. Being able to think critically enables nurses to meet the needs of patients within their context and considering their preferences; meet the needs of patients within the context of uncertainty; consider alternatives, resulting in higher-quality care; 33 and think reflectively, rather than simply accepting statements and performing tasks without significant understanding and evaluation.

Thinking critically implies that one has a knowledge base from which to reason and the ability to analyze and evaluate evidence. Clinical decisionmaking is particularly influenced by reasoning in critical thinking relationships with colleagues, 39 patient conditions, availability of resources, 40 knowledge, and experience.

This requires accurate interpretation of patient data that is relevant to the specific patient and situation. As Dunne notes. A practice is not just a surface on which one can display instant virtuosity. It grounds one in a tradition that has been formed through an elaborate development and that exists at any juncture only in the dispositions slowly and perhaps painfully acquired of its recognized practitioners. Clearly Dunne is engaging in critical reflection about the conditions for developing character, skills, and habits for skillful and ethical comportment of practitioners, as well as to act as moral agents for patients reasoning in critical thinking that they and their families receive safe, effective, and compassionate care.

Professional socialization or professional values, while necessary, do not adequately address character and skill formation that transform the way the practitioner exists in his or her world, what the practitioner is capable of noticing and responding to, reasoning in critical thinking, based upon well-established patterns of emotional responses, skills, dispositions to act, reasoning in critical thinking the skills to respond, decide, and act.

In nursing and medicine, many have questioned whether current health care institutions are designed reasoning in critical thinking promote or hinder enlightened, compassionate practice, or whether they have deteriorated into commercial institutional models that focus primarily on efficiency and profit.

MacIntyre points out the links between the ongoing development and improvement of practice traditions and the institutions that house them:. Lack of justice, lack of truthfulness, lack of courage, lack of the relevant intellectual virtues—these corrupt traditions, just as they do those institutions and practices which derive their life from the traditions of which they are the contemporary embodiments. To recognize this is of course also to recognize the existence of an additional virtue, one whose importance is perhaps most obvious when it is least present, the virtue of having an adequate sense of the traditions to which one belongs or which confront one.

This virtue is not to be confused with any form of conservative antiquarianism; I am not praising those who choose the conventional conservative role of laudator temporis acti. It is rather the case that an adequate sense of tradition manifests itself in a grasp of those future possibilities which the past has made available to the reasoning in critical thinking. Living traditions, just because they continue a not-yet-completed narrative, confront a future whose determinate and determinable character, so far as it possesses any, derives from the past 30 p.

It would be impossible to capture all reasoning in critical thinking situated and distributed knowledge outside of actual practice situations and particular patients. However, students can be limited in their inability to convey underdetermined situations where much of the information is based on perceptions of many aspects of the patient and changes that have occurred over time.

Simulations cannot have the sub-cultures formed in practice settings that set the social mood of trust, distrust, competency, limited resources, or other forms of situated possibilities.

 

Critical thinking - Wikipedia

 

reasoning in critical thinking

 

It’s no surprise that critical thinking abilities are some of the most sought-after skills in almost every industry and workplace. You can demonstrate critical thinking by using keywords related to this skill in your resume and cover letter, and during your interview. Critical Thinking Disciplined thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence. A group of interconnected skills to analyze, creatively integrate and evaluate what you read, hear or observe. Critical thinking is first step toward developing clinical reasoning necessary skill for a college graduate and a healthcare professional cornerstone of the Nursing Program. For this reason, the development of critical thinking skills and dispositions is a life-long endeavor. Another Brief Conceptualization of Critical Thinking. Critical thinking is self-guided, self-disciplined thinking which attempts to reason at the highest level of quality in a fair-minded way.